|
Q & A with Dr. Roger Chapman, PSC-Support Group (2001); courtesy of TJ & Barb Henshaw
1. Can you please describe the hypothetical mechanism by which a high (20-30
mg/kg) Urso dose works to slow the progression of PSC in those patients who
experience this benefit? Is it "merely" that the drug "thins the bile" and
eases its passage through the ducts, or is there more to it than that? In
your view, why do some patients taking the high dose fail to benefit much, or
at least as much, as other patients taking the same dose who are in the same
stage of the disease?
A: The mechanism of efficacy of high dose urso is not known. It is known
that children with cystic fibrosis need higher dose for efficacy, it may be
that it is a more effective choleretic ie encouraging bile flow but we don't
know. The paper from my group showing that the higher dose is more effecive
is to be published soon in Gastroenterology.
2. Would you be able to estimate for us what the approximate half-life of
Urso is in the body? We ask because people taking large doses (in one case,
for example, sixteen 300 mg capsules daily) may find it more convenient to
take 6 or 7 capsules at, say, 8 am, and another 7 or 8 capsules at, say, 8
pm. Does such a schedule pose the risk that: (A) some of the Urso may not be
well absorbed by the body?; or (B) there may be sub-optimal levels of the
drug in the body during the 12 hour interval between administrations?
A: A dutch group have shown that urso once a day is as effective as twice
daily. The drug is recycling throughout and a 12 hour interval would be fine.
3. Do you think it likely that the high dose Urso program would yield
benefits for a PSC patient's Ulcerative Colitis or Crohns? Alternatively,
could the program exacerbate the symptoms (i.e., cause flareups) or hasten
the progression of other digestive/intestinal conditions?
A: An interesting Question! High dose urso has not caused any problems with
UC or Crohns. I believe that there may be theoretical benefits but there is
no evidence yet.
4. Would there be any potential benefit from taking higher dosages of Urso
(i.e., 40 or 50 mg/kg)? Or are the potential adverse effects too great to
warrant this dosage?
A: we are studying 30mg/kg if it looks a better dose than 20mg/kg we may
study 40mg/kg.
5. For patients in Stage II or III of their PSC progression, do you recommend
a somewhat different dosage or protocol of Urso/Actigall therapy?
A: I do not advise a different dose regimen at different disease stages.
There is no evidence to justify diff dosages.
6. For patients with variants of PSC-such as Small Duct PSC-do you recommend
a different dosage level of Urso; or are there other differences in your
recommended treatment?
A: Good question, but we don't know. We are about to publish our experience
with small duct PSC, anecdotally they seem to respond well to high dose urso.
7. Short of ERCP or biopsy, how can we tell if the high dose is working for
us (if we are likely to be among the group that benefits from it)? For
example, if pruritus is significantly reduced after commencing the high dose
regimen, does this suggest that the high dose will slow progression? Along
these lines, what meaning is there to lowered LFTs? Is the only real
indicator a biopsy or ERCP, and how long does one have to wait to see the
results of the high dose in those tests?
A: The markers of reponse are indirect ie LFT's, gold standard remains liver
biosy and or ERCP. I dont believe that MRCP is good enough yet, and other
surrogate markers of fibrosis are being developed but not yet on stream.
9. Are you aware of reports regarding any medium- or long-term negative side
effects of the high Actigall dose?
A: I am unaware of any long term negative side effects of urso.
10. Do you think that taking Urso within, say, 1-2 hours, of taking SAM-e;
Vitamins B and E; or Milk Thistle or N Acetyl Cysteine (these are all
supplements that many of our members are currently taking) poses a risk for
sub-optimal bioavailability of Urso? Conversely, would administration of Urso
at the same time as these nutrients pose a significant chance of diminishing
the bioavailability of these nutrients? How about taking Urso at the same
time as other drugs (for example, Asacol or other medications for Ulcerative
Colitis)? We ask this because, given the need to avoid taking Urso within as
many as five hours of taking Cholestyramine/ Questran, it may be difficult
for some people to arrange to take Urso at a different time from when they
take other drugs.
A: as you say urso should be taken 2 hrs away from Questran, there is no
data but no reason to suppose that the other agents you mention would
interfere with the absorption of urso
11. Speaking of various nutrientional supplements, what are your thoughts
regarding the likely or possible benefits of taking Milk Thistle, SAM-e,
Glutathione and NAC (that is, for slowing the progression of PSC or
mitigating some of its symptoms)? Many of our members take some or all of
these and other nutrients, but we recognize that authoritative scientific
evidence in support of a benefit for chronic liver disease (or PSC in
particular) has yet to be advanced. In the absence of authoritative
scientific evidence, it would be valuable for us to hear your insights or
even your speculative thoughts about which nutrients/non-drug supplements
might plausibly be used to try to slow the progression of PSC.
A: There is really no evidence to support the use of these agents ie milk
thistle, in PSC, but they appear to do no harm!
12. Would you please discuss the prospects for finding the cause and the
cure for PSC in the next, say, ten years? Are there particular scientists,
research projects, or subspecialties of research (genetic research or
canalicular research, etc) that you feel hold particular promise?
A: I cannot forsee a cure for PSC in 10 years. I think we will better
understand the molecular basis of the disease and relationship with colitis
,and it is possible that anti cyokines may offer a lot of benefit, but a cure
is unlikely.
13. What are your thoughts regarding how PSC patients and their families can
assist in the search for the etiology and cure of the disease? For example,
would it help if our members offered to enroll in a large, multi-center
(country) trial of your high-dose Urso/Actigall protocol? Are there
significant potential benefits to be derived from a relatively large genetic
study that seeks to identify the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism(s) implicated
in PSC? Would you be willing to help us to plan such a project?
A: I'm sure that your suggestion of large multi center trials is absolutely
correct, the logistics of a Brit organising a US trial would are considerable
however although I would be very happy to be involved in helping to design
the study. I know that Dr Keith Lindor at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota is
currently thinking about such a trial. Again the idea of a large US data base
is exciting and important but prob requires a US investigator such as Dr
Lindor to coordinate it. The other person would be Dr Jenny Heathcote in
Toronto, Canada.
I'm sorry to have taken so long to reply but I will try and be prompter in
future!
Please keep in touch,
best wishes
Roger Chapman
|